Last complete collection 14 days ago
·snapshot 2026-10-17
·
4,771 of 4,772 records
· 48/48 pages
·verdict COMPLETE
·4 snapshot(s) held
Route · /scheme/haryana-chirayu-families-having-income-less-than-or-equal-to-ayushman-bharat-har
CHIRAYU-Families having income less than or equal to Ayushman Bharat Haryana Health Protection Authority
Named by 1 government source(s), and not listed on myScheme
Haryana BudgetNot on myScheme
No documentation checks for this scheme
The nine checks measure what myScheme publishes about a scheme. There is no myScheme
record here to measure, so this page shows none. A score of nought would read
as a verdict on the scheme when it is a fact about the portal.
What Haryana publishes about this
From the state’s own budget books · myScheme has no
record of it
Ayushman Bharat Scheme was implemented in the State of Haryana on 15th August, 2018 for deprived categories as mentioned in SECC-2011 census database. Every Family figuring in defined Socio Economic Caste Census 2011 database will be entitled to claim benefits under the scheme. The Government of India guidelines provide a treatment cover of Rs. 5 lakh per family per annum on family floater basis and operational cost of Rs. 15.00 Crore covering 15.51 Lakh beneficiary families (identified through SECC 2011 database) of Haryana with no restriction on family size. The cost is being shared in 60:40 ratio by the Government of India and the Government of Haryana. The Hon'ble Chief Minister, Haryana has launched the Comprehensive Health Insurance of Antyodaya Units (CHIRAYU) Scheme on 21/11/2022 for the extension of AB- PMJAY benefits to the families having annual income less than or equal to Rs. 1.80 Lakh.
How this was judged a scheme rather than a budget head
A state budget book lists colleges, directorates and building heads beside schemes.
This row scored 1 on published signals: the provision is establishment money, not works.
It does NOT clear the higher bar this register uses before saying a scheme is hidden from citizens, so it is listed here and not named there. Listing a budget head as a scheme is an annoyance; naming one as hidden would be a false accusation, and the two are not the same claim.