Last complete collection 14 days ago
·snapshot 2026-10-17
·
4,771 of 4,772 records
· 48/48 pages
·verdict COMPLETE
·4 snapshot(s) held
Route · /scheme/haryana-compensation-to-farmers-for-loss-of-their-crop-due-to-breach-of-canal-p-
Compensation to farmers for loss of their crop due to breach of canal
Named by 1 government source(s), and not listed on myScheme
Haryana BudgetNot on myScheme
No documentation checks for this scheme
The nine checks measure what myScheme publishes about a scheme. There is no myScheme
record here to measure, so this page shows none. A score of nought would read
as a verdict on the scheme when it is a fact about the portal.
What Haryana publishes about this
From the state’s own budget books · myScheme has no
record of it
Irrigation and Water Resources Department, Haryana is maintaining the irrigation canal network with its best efficiency and efforts. However, due to shortage of regular watch and ward staff and due to natural reasons such as rat, snake holes, weak bunds etc. some unexpected breaches of canal occurred and because of which the water is filled up in the adjoining fields and sometimes standing crops were damaged. The farmers of the adjoining fields whose crops were damaged have to bear the loss without any fault. The Government has decided that compensation to farmers for loss of their crop due to breach of canal will be given after confirming the assessment of field and District authorities. The approval of the Government for case to case basis as per the recommendation of District Level Authorities shall be taken-up.
How this was judged a scheme rather than a budget head
A state budget book lists colleges, directorates and building heads beside schemes.
This row scored 1 on published signals: a benefit word in the name; the subject is a facility rather than a person; the provision is establishment money, not works.
It does NOT clear the higher bar this register uses before saying a scheme is hidden from citizens, so it is listed here and not named there. Listing a budget head as a scheme is an annoyance; naming one as hidden would be a false accusation, and the two are not the same claim.