Last complete collection 14 days ago
·snapshot 2026-10-17
·
4,771 of 4,772 records
· 48/48 pages
·verdict COMPLETE
·4 snapshot(s) held
Route · /scheme/haryana-continuous-and-comprehensive-evaluation-p-01-12-2202-02-109-83-51
Continuous and Comprehensive Evaluation
Named by 1 government source(s), and not listed on myScheme
Haryana BudgetNot on myScheme
No documentation checks for this scheme
The nine checks measure what myScheme publishes about a scheme. There is no myScheme
record here to measure, so this page shows none. A score of nought would read
as a verdict on the scheme when it is a fact about the portal.
What Haryana publishes about this
From the state’s own budget books · myScheme has no
record of it
Teaching and evaluation have been taken together since long time in our education system. In traditional approaches, the area of assessment has been limited to the cognitive domain only and the objective of assessment has been just to declare how much the student has learnt. This approach encouraged rote learning to pass the examination. Therefore, it doesn’t serve the needs of the present time and there is a need to equip schools with appropriate mechanism of evaluation for regular assessment of all aspects of pupil growth and development i.e. continuous and comprehensive evaluation. In the light of NCF-2005, Department of School Education, Haryana has decided to adopt continuous and comprehensive evaluation in its schools at Senior & Secondary level. In this process, department has started monthly, half yearly and annual assessment test from class 9th to 12th. These help in judging the level of the students regularly and take remedial action timely.
How this was judged a scheme rather than a budget head
A state budget book lists colleges, directorates and building heads beside schemes.
This row scored 1 on published signals: the provision is establishment money, not works.
It does NOT clear the higher bar this register uses before saying a scheme is hidden from citizens, so it is listed here and not named there. Listing a budget head as a scheme is an annoyance; naming one as hidden would be a false accusation, and the two are not the same claim.