Last complete collection 14 days ago
·snapshot 2026-10-17
·
4,771 of 4,772 records
· 48/48 pages
·verdict COMPLETE
·4 snapshot(s) held
Route · /scheme/haryana-contribution-to-local-bodies-from-the-proceeds-of-stamp-duty-to-eedfd7f8
Contribution to Local Bodies from the proceeds of Stamp Duty to Municipal Committees / Councils
Named by 1 government source(s), and not listed on myScheme
Haryana BudgetNot on myScheme
No documentation checks for this scheme
The nine checks measure what myScheme publishes about a scheme. There is no myScheme
record here to measure, so this page shows none. A score of nought would read
as a verdict on the scheme when it is a fact about the portal.
What Haryana publishes about this
From the state’s own budget books · myScheme has no
record of it
The object of the scheme is to provide the basic civic amenities like drainage, roads, development of parks etc. in Municipal areas of Urban Local Bodies from 2% of stamp duty collection by Revenue Department. Vide Government notification No.8/5/2021-4CII dated 05.03.2021 and 15.07.2021, it has been decided that 2% stamp duty charged on registration of properties situated in a particular urban area will be assigned directly to the Municipal Councils/Committee concerned. Out of 2% stamp duty, 1% stamp duty will be transferred directly to the urban local bodies concerned and 1% will go to the common account of the department for the development works. The Deputy Commissioners will follow the process of determining the actual amounts payable to each Municipal Committees/Councils on the basis of actual sale of Non-Judicial Stamp paper.
How this was judged a scheme rather than a budget head
A state budget book lists colleges, directorates and building heads beside schemes.
This row scored 1 on published signals: the provision is establishment money, not works.
It does NOT clear the higher bar this register uses before saying a scheme is hidden from citizens, so it is listed here and not named there. Listing a budget head as a scheme is an annoyance; naming one as hidden would be a false accusation, and the two are not the same claim.