Last complete collection 14 days ago
·snapshot 2026-10-17
·
4,771 of 4,772 records
· 48/48 pages
·verdict COMPLETE
·4 snapshot(s) held
Route · /scheme/haryana-expansion-of-facilities-classes-i-v-full-time-p-01-12-2202-01-101-97-51
Expansion of facilities Classes I-V (Full time)
Named by 1 government source(s), and not listed on myScheme
Haryana BudgetNot on myScheme
No documentation checks for this scheme
The nine checks measure what myScheme publishes about a scheme. There is no myScheme
record here to measure, so this page shows none. A score of nought would read
as a verdict on the scheme when it is a fact about the portal.
What Haryana publishes about this
From the state’s own budget books · myScheme has no
record of it
The objective of the scheme is provide the infrastructure to improve the quality of education in 1420 Government Model Sanskriti Primary School (GMSPS). To cover up the language /communication gap of the students, the Language Labs will be established in phased manner. To impart the education with the play way methods various equipments and teaching aids will also be provided upliftment the educational standards for the students. Under this scheme, two schools (one primary and one middle school) are honoured with cash prizes at Block, District and State level on 26th January every year. The goal of the department is to provide clean, healthy & learning environment to the students in govt. schools by beautifying their building infrastructure as well as clean environment. About 284 schools will be covered in this scheme. The prizes under this scheme are distributed as under: i) At Block Level ₹50,000/- (for one primary and middle school each) ii) At District Level ₹1,00,000/- (for one primary and middle school each)
How this was judged a scheme rather than a budget head
A state budget book lists colleges, directorates and building heads beside schemes.
This row scored 1 on published signals: the provision is establishment money, not works.
It does NOT clear the higher bar this register uses before saying a scheme is hidden from citizens, so it is listed here and not named there. Listing a budget head as a scheme is an annoyance; naming one as hidden would be a false accusation, and the two are not the same claim.