Route · /scheme/haryana-livestock-health-and-disease-control-p-02-10-2403-51-789-92-51
Livestock Health and Disease Control
Named by 1 government source(s), and not listed on myScheme
Haryana BudgetNot on myScheme
What Haryana publishes about this
From the state’s own budget books · myScheme has no
record of it
Centre Share: `4,80,00,000/- State Share : `3,20,00,000/- This scheme includes the following ongoing component for which the Government of India releases funds regularly:- (i) Assistance to States for the control of animal Diseases (ASCAD) The Government of India has approved a macro management centrally sponsored scheme namely "Livestock Health & Disease Control". Assistance to States for the control of Animal diseases (ASCAD) is one of its component. The main object of this scheme is to control economically important diseases of livestock and poultry in the country by way of immunization and strengthening/modernization of existing biological products units/State Disease Diagnostic Laboratories. (ii) Foot and Mouth disease Control (FMD) Programme FMD is the most important livestock disease in term of economic impact though the morbidity rate is high and the mortality rate due to FMD is low. The economic losses caused by the disease are mainly due to loss in milk production, reduction in working ability of working animals, reduction in the body weight leading reduced yields of meat etc. To prevent economic losses due to FMD and to develop herd immunity in cloven- footed animals, a location specific programme called Foot and Mouth Disease Control Programme with 60 % central assistance is being implemented in the entire State under which a major thrust is upon the control and virtual eradication of Foot & Mouth Disease from the country as a whole and Haryana in particular. For this, mass vaccination and routine vaccination of all the susceptible animals within a zone will be undertaken. (iii) Control of Brucellosis Brucellosis is also an economically important abortifacient disease of cattle. Infected cows/buffaloes usually abort in the second half of pregnancy with the squeal of retained placenta, delayed involution, predisposal to secondary bacterial infections and acute or chronic endometritis. In several cases, it may cause ovaro-bursal adhesions resulting into permanent sterility. Some of the infected animals, which carry fetus to term, often give birth to either dead or weak and underweight calves leading to heavy neonatal mortality. Infected cows usually abort once but may continue to shed the organism subsequently, sometimes for life. There is high risk of Brucellosis transmission through artificial insemination as the semen is deposited after passing cervix which officers a protective barrier. Provision has also been made under this scheme for the taking steps to control this disease also. In initial phase, the testing against brucellosis will be undertaken at bull mother farms, sperm production centers and in the areas having high density of good quality livestock. (iv) Peste-des-Petits Ruminants Control Programme (PPR-CP) Peste-des-petits Ruminants (PPR) also known as ‘Goat Plague’ is a viral disease that affects goats and sheep, which causes huge financial loss to the livestock farmers and economic loss to the country. The Peste des Petits Ruminants (PPR) is characterized by high fever, inflammation of the gastro-intestinal tract leading to necrosis and ulceration of the mucous membrane and diarrhea. The PPR infection causes huge losses in the rural economy both in terms of morbidity and mortality in sheep and goats. The symptoms of disease are purulent discharge from eyes & nose, sores in mouth, swollen & eroded lips, diarrhea, sudden fever, pneumonia and coughing. Affected animals appear restless, have a dull coat, dry muzzle and depressed appetite and the pregnant animals
How this was judged a scheme rather than a budget head
A state budget book lists colleges, directorates and building heads beside schemes.
This row scored 3 on published signals: the provision is establishment money, not works; the Centre shares the cost; the state files it as a shared scheme.
It does NOT clear the higher bar this register uses before saying a scheme is hidden from citizens, so it is listed here and not named there. Listing a budget head as a scheme is an annoyance; naming one as hidden would be a false accusation, and the two are not the same claim.