Route · /scheme/haryana-start-up-village-enterpreneurship-programme-nrlm-svep-p-02-20-2501-06-10
Start-up Village Enterpreneurship Programme (NRLM, SVEP)
Named by 1 government source(s), and not listed on myScheme
Haryana BudgetNot on myScheme
No documentation checks for this scheme
The nine checks measure what myScheme publishes about a scheme. There is no myScheme
record here to measure, so this page shows none. A score of nought would read
as a verdict on the scheme when it is a fact about the portal.
What Haryana publishes about this
From the state’s own budget books · myScheme has no
record of it
Name of Scheme Start-up Village Entrepreneurship Programme (NRLM, SVEP) Centre Share: `6,00,00,000/- State Share : `4,00,00,000/- This is a Centrally Sponsored Scheme on 60:40 sharing basis between Centre and State. Start-up Village Entrepreneurship Programme (SVEP), a sub scheme of NRLM is for helping rural poor youth to start and support rural enterprises. The overall objective of SVEP is to stimulate economic growth and reduce poverty and unemployment in the villages. Objectives: 1. Aim to promote village entrepreneurship through ICT-based training and capacity building, enterprise advisory services, and loan support from banks, SHGs, and federations. 2. Develop local resources by training a pool of village level community cadre (CRP EP) and build the capacity of the NRLM and SHG federations to monitor and direct the work of the CRP EPs. 3. Help the rural entrepreneurs to access finance for starting their enterprises from the NRLM SHG and federations, the banking systems including the proposed MUDRA bank.
How this was judged a scheme rather than a budget head
A state budget book lists colleges, directorates and building heads beside schemes.
This row scored 3 on published signals: the provision is establishment money, not works; the Centre shares the cost; the state files it as a shared scheme.
It does NOT clear the higher bar this register uses before saying a scheme is hidden from citizens, so it is listed here and not named there. Listing a budget head as a scheme is an annoyance; naming one as hidden would be a false accusation, and the two are not the same claim.