Route · /scheme/haryana-state-environment-impact-assessment-authority-establishment-expenses-p-0
State Environment Impact Assessment Authority- Establishment Expenses
Named by 1 government source(s), and not listed on myScheme
Haryana BudgetNot on myScheme
No documentation checks for this scheme
The nine checks measure what myScheme publishes about a scheme. There is no myScheme
record here to measure, so this page shows none. A score of nought would read
as a verdict on the scheme when it is a fact about the portal.
What Haryana publishes about this
From the state’s own budget books · myScheme has no
record of it
The State Environment Impact Assessment Authority (SEIAA) Haryana has been setup by Ministry of Environment, Forest & Climate Change, Government of India, on the recommendation of the State Government as required under EIA Notification for according environmental clearance to Category “B” Projects covered under EIA Notification dated 14.09.2006 in the State of Haryana. EIA Notification is applicable since its inception for different projects like Mining Projects (sand mining, stone mining, etc.), Bio-medical Waste, Common Effluent Treatment Plant, Manufacturing/Storage Units of Hazardous Chemicals and all Construction Projects (more than 20,000 sq.mt. etc.). The State Level Environment Impact Assessment Authority has been reconstituted on 24.12.2025 for three years as per Gazette Notification Govt. of India. The funds are required for salary, sitting fees, travel allowances, purchase of vehicle for Chairman, SEIAA, various site visits, procurement of office items etc.
How this was judged a scheme rather than a budget head
A state budget book lists colleges, directorates and building heads beside schemes.
This row scored 1 on published signals: the provision is establishment money, not works.
It does NOT clear the higher bar this register uses before saying a scheme is hidden from citizens, so it is listed here and not named there. Listing a budget head as a scheme is an annoyance; naming one as hidden would be a false accusation, and the two are not the same claim.